AARDVK wrote:
Because BT doesn't understand how much a draw team play is, apparently they are willing to put a stake in it. Why on earth would locations pay for a system that anyone--including the many solo players--could access at home? Even diehards like us can figure out how to spend less money and time staying at home and playing on the premium games we might still care about than going out to a location, unless by going out we get to meet up with and have fun with fellow players.
It's one of the problems I have with going full tilt on a player outreach program, when probably as a an ex-bankruptcy lawyer I should just be figuring out how to get the players standing as a committee in the inevitable Chapter 11. Because: if you can play it elsewhere, you're probably not going to go to one of the "hospitality" locations to do it, so they will eventually disappear. And if you play it elsewhere, all the problems with typos, wrong answers, repeat games, etc. will do the enterprise in. There's just better purely online trivia out there. For instance, I have yet to see a copyediting/fact question problem with Facebook's "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?". (Those folks care enough about their product to make sure it won't disappoint the people who invest time in playing it.)
Brooke/AARDVK
I think we had this conversation a few years ago at the NTN forum, but I'm having a hard time getting standing to a committee of users. But as you know better than I, BK is weird. The only thing I can think of is a third-party beneficiary theory of some sort, and I don't know enough about BK to get that past a judge. Now, that said, a committee of aggrieved bar owners who lose a boatload of customer money attributable to New Buzztime -- that is a different enchilada and a better case than players IMHO.
Okay, back to boring, comatose and pull the plug and let me die with dignity contract drafting.