spotes wrote:
Forum moderation via peer review strikes me as untenable.
It puts those players in extraordinarily awkward positions of power without actually giving them any.
Much like the best forms of government, I suspect forum moderation is best done by as few people as possible with absolute power, a modicum of sense, and little personal interest.
Hmmm...responding to a FOOBAR post. I feel like I'm in an alternate universe. A universe full of gruff, but lovable sauciness...

My desire is for moderation to be unrequired.
On the old Scaratings, mostly things were very congenial.
I think I deleted one post ever (besides a few spamming tupperware offers) and sent a detailed explanation to the member. I hope we can all disagree on various issues while respecting that there may be validity to opposing views.
Without "the official buzztime sponsoring presence" there should not be a need to kill the messenger, so hopefully the tone will be better that the BT forum, where people had "an official voice to complain to".
One thing I would hope for would be that any buzzies who post here would get absolute respect, and the benefit of the doubt. There were buzzies on the old site, and they were treated respectfully and provided a perspective that improved the overall site. They were and will be here voluntarily, and personal attacks should be frowned up.
I'd hate to have to defend the actions of my company on a BB, and I'm damn proud of it. But, we make mistakes and errors like any company, but the folks here are all good ones.
Based on the old site experience, I am confident that these issues will be minor, if any.
Scar, off his soapbox and back to work.